Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silk lingerie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect to lingerie. No content mergeable, but editors are free to dig up and prune all the POV from the original article to merge (if anything useable exists). Johnleemk | Talk 16:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Silk lingerie
Article is advertisement.TheRingess 05:21, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to Lingerie, but NPOV it considerably. It looks like a copyvio, but I can't find it.  User:Zoe|(talk) 05:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per Zoe. Movementarian 12:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep difficult to merge, given that Lingerie is currently less more than a list. I am going to remove some POV from it (I do not think much will be left). - Liberatore(T) 16:39, 21 December 2005 (UTC) Delete; attempting at removing POV from the article, I realized that rewriting the article from scratch would just be easier. - Liberatore(T) 16:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.