Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silky Baines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:47, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Silky Baines

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:ATHLETE, or WP:ENTERTAINER. Nikki ♥  311   04:14, 26 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  — Nikki  ♥  311   04:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Working for redlinked promotions is not enough to establish notability. When searching for sources, I found one brief mention on a site that looked like it could have passed for reliable (although simply mentioning his name once isn't enough to establish notability). As an aside, although it didn't influence my comments here, the article creator's vandalism of the New Year's Revolution (2006) article didn't do too much toward encouraging good faith here. GaryColemanFan (talk) 17:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - WP:ATHLETE is not applicable here as he is not an athlete as encompassed in that guideline. I find no signficant coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG, nor any evidence for meeting WP:ENTERTAINER. -- Whpq (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.