Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silva Iaponicarum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Silva Iaponicarum

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable journal. Tagged for notability and sources since 2014. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 23:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 23:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. According to the journal's website, it is included in the Polish Ministry of Education and Science periodical index (40 points) and the ERIH PLUS database. Are these considered non-selective? Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 *  Keep , quick google books search shows that articles are widely cited in English literature on the topic. Marcelus (talk) 08:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC) Changing the vote Marcelus (talk) 08:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment: A smattering of citations is to be expected for any scientific journal. I don't see the number of citations that would indicate notability. --Randykitty (talk) 10:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:JOURNALCRIT: Criterion 2: The journal is frequently cited by other reliable sources. Marcelus (talk) 12:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Yep, it all depends on what you think is "frequently" and whether you perhaps have sources that confirm this... --Randykitty (talk) 14:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting. Do you want to strike the "Keep" opinion? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not indexed in any selective databases. GScholar shows citations in single digits, sorry User:Marcelus but I don't see GNG here. PS. I started a deletion at pl wiki: pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2024:01:12:Silva Iaponicarum. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok, I trust your judgment on this, I'm not fully familiar with the GNG for scientific journals. Marcelus (talk) 08:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Marcelus See Notability (academic journals). This may survive on pl wiki which is pretty inclusionist for such entities, but English Wikipedia has a bit higher standards. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. It exists, but I can't find anything more that can be sourced to anything but itself. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. Kept on pl wiki, which is much more inclusionist and open to counting votes. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.