Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver Moon Books (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Silver Moon Bookshop. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 11:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Silver Moon Books
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability per WP:ORG found in the article or in a Google search. Not to be confused with Silver Moon Books (erotic publisher), which is also nominated for deletion. Could be redirected to Silver Moon Bookshop after deletion; all content in this one-sentence article is already in that other article.  Sandstein  20:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment The previous AfD linked here seems to be for the erotic publisher. For this one, the crossover with the linked bookshop makes it difficult to isolate particular references, but some such as "Feminist interventions in international communication" are as much about the publisher as the bookshop. But given that crossover there's an argument for a Mergeto on Silver Moon Bookshop as the resolution? AllyD (talk) 22:25, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, I'm seeing good coverage in multiple secondary reliable independent sources. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:24, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Which sources, and what sort of coverage?  Sandstein   09:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. Most of what I found in searching related to the erotic publisher rather than this business. I just wasn't able to find anything that wasn't a business listing, copy of a Wikipedia article, or a notice of something that was being published by the business. Much like the erotic publisher by the same name, this is a case of a business that might be doing well but just isn't getting enough notice to provide enough reliable sources to prove notability.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 15:53, 24 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Silver Moon Bookshop. Cusop Dingle (talk) 17:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - and create redirect - there doesn't much to merge. Not wiki notable org. Youreallycan (talk) 18:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Silver Moon Bookshop. Not enough stuff for a separate article. Cavarrone (talk) 12:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.