Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silverado Park, Long Beach, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Article is fine now. (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 08:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Silverado Park, Long Beach, California

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article is two sentences long and fails to present any true notability. No articles link to it either. NJZombie (talk) 03:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  03:29, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:29, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * keep&mdash;with Eastmain's references, it's clear that it meets gng. i've added another one myself, and there are more. nominator could have found these sources, see WP:BEFORE.&mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Three reliable sources in article, , . Northamerica1000 (talk) 19:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Very well sourced, has just made the amount of required information for a stub, this could be expanded upon, so keep. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 18:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Google news archive shows over a hundred results. Many are hidden behind paywalls, but they do discuss the park and activities there.   D r e a m Focus  20:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, now improved.--Milowent • talkblp-r 04:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems to have plenty of references. Dontforgetthisone (talk) 17:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.