Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silverburn Shopping Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Apparently this does meet GNG afterall - Made a typo in the name which explains the "No results containing all your search terms were found.", Withdrawn (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Silverburn Shopping Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable shopping centre, Fails MALLS as well as GNG – Davey 2010 Talk 19:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems to pass WP:GNG with several news stories since 2007: not always of particularly high quality or large size, but cumulatively they provide enough to meet GNG. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:09, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment As there don't seem to be criteria for notability at WP:MALLS I'm unclear as to how an article could fail them. Coverage in multiple RSs would seem to indicate passing WP:GNG, unless there is something deficient in these citations. Clarification regarding both of these aspects would be appreciated; otherwise I'm inclined to keep. Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:35, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.