Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silveroak Legal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 04:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Silveroak Legal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced, this article is more advertising than telling us why this company is notable. Non-notable IMO Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Just another law firm.  Probably could have been speedily deleted under WP:A7. TJRC (talk) 18:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No assertion is made which meets any of Wikipedia's inclusion criteria.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  18:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Simply an advertisement (and poorly done one at that). No indication of notability. – S. Rich (talk) 05:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.