Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silversmith Capital Partners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Silversmith Capital Partners

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIRS and WP:DEL14. No indication of being notable. Refs are routine coverage.  scope_creep Talk  23:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP, sources do not show enough notability (routine coverage) for an article. TheManInTheBlackHat  (Talk)  23:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails NCORP. Gusfriend (talk) 23:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. In particular, all references in this and earlier versions are trivial per WP:CORPDEPTH. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 00:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies,  and Massachusetts.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Straight fail of WP:NCORP with zero WP:SIGCOV of the business in any quality independent WP:RS; refs are all marketing/promotion (given history, may also need WP:SALTing). 78.18.228.191 (talk) 09:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is nothing here that is not there for most startups with nothing going but funding. It's just WP:PROMO based on ordinary stuff. Per WP:CORPDEPTH, "Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability", and per WP:ORGIND, reliable sources independent need to exist. All of these sources fail. Jacona (talk) 13:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Llacb47 (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the refs meet NCORP/GNG criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 14:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)`
 * Delete. Promotional article on a subject that fails WP:NCORP, WP:NORG, and WP:CORPDEPTH. Nowhere near sufficient WP:SIGCOV to satisfy any of these, let alone WP:GNG. Shawn Teller (talk) 02:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.