Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silverstone (plastic)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) Vexations (talk) 13:23, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Silverstone (plastic)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sign of notability Jtbobwaysf (talk) 08:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 January 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 09:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Withdraw & Keep I am the nominator and while few it does seem to have some coverage Washington Post and Townsend Letter and Gizmodo. Might be good to Keep for its historical value. I will add the sources to the article. Thanks and apologize for the hassle! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.