Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silverwolf Comics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Daniel (talk) 12:51, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Silverwolf Comics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This Company does not seem to meet WP:N or WP:CORP. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - I believe WP:BEFORE would show enough notability. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:Before is not notability guideline or criteria, as for the suggestions in WP:Before I have looked for reliable sources and came up with nothing except others wikis, blogs and a comic book store called Silverwolf comics and collectables. At this point I am asking for proof this is notable as per WP:N or WP:NCORP. Just because a couple of notable people worked there does not mean the company is notable, notability is not inherited.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete. It existed (albeit for two years) and it has some association with notable persons, but I don't see where any of that translated into actual coverage for the company. All I can find are brief mentions in relation to the notable artists ("so-and-so did stuff for Silverwolf Comics before doing this" type of stuff) but none of it is in-depth and it's rarely more than a brief mention in a sentence about a lot of places where the artist had worked. Notability is not inherited by an artist working for a company (WP:NOTINHERITED) and then going on to do notable things in their career, especially if their work at Silverwolf never gained any attention in RS, which appears to be the case. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (consult)  @ 18:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:37, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing in the article is verified, because it is completely unsourced and has been for many years. In a search for sources, all I found was mentions on obscure blogs and a small market in collectibles. This company never produced any comics notable enough to have a page here, and its claimed association with notable employees or artists fails both WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:Verifiability. --MelanieN (talk) 20:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.