Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvia Busuioc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:15, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Silvia Busuioc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I think the level of sourcing easily qualifies this as tabloid trash rather than encyclopedic material. Of the links that worked, here's what I got:


 * no mention
 * passing mention, passing mention, passing mention
 * some glossy women's magazine gushing over her red-carpet outfit
 * two press releases, once repeated: Italian, Italian; Romanian, Romanian

Like I said, pretty poor, and no real indication she might pass WP:ENT or WP:BIO. Which isn't surprising: the article creator specializes in biographies of nonentities, and is probably paid for his work. - Biruitorul Talk 00:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The articles are mostly from fashion magazines and are about what she wore rather than her work. There are some longer articles in Moldovian which are about her (from what I can make out). She does have a starring role in an Italian film soon to be released. I'd call this one WP:TOOSOON. She may become a blockbuster star, but at age 25 it looks like her career may just be beginning. LaMona (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep A well known actress in Italy.User:Lucifero4
 * " A well-known actress" is not a valid argument. By the way, if she were really well-known her article would not possibly have fallen here. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:13, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Struck comment above of blocked sock puppet, per WP:SOCKHELP. NorthAmerica1000 12:17, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Poorly sourced promotional article coming from promotional sockfarm. Violates TOU in terms of undeclared COI editing.  Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:40, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.