Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvia H. Allred


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Silvia H. Allred

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non-notable subject that does not meet WP:BASIC. Coverage found in searches for independent, reliable sources is limited to name checks and very short mentions. No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources appears to exist. The article is entirely reliant upon primary sources, which do not serve to establish notability. See also: WP:SPIP: "The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it—without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter." – North America1000 23:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete We don't have inherent notability standards for religious figures and, even if we did, the general presidency of the Relief Society of the LDS would certainly not meet those standards (unlike maybe the High Council). In the absence of that, this would have to meet the GNG which it does not. Chetsford (talk) 23:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * There are over 3,000 LDS high councils. So no, membership in a high council is much, much less likely to be a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you're right. I actually meant to say the Quorum of Twelve. Chetsford (talk) 02:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The leadership of the LDS Church Relief Society is a top position within the Church, regularly addressing general conference, women's conferences and noted for their touring and participation in temple dedications.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment – None of the above points qualifies notability as per Wikipedia's standards for notability. Subjects that the LDS church considers to be noteworthy do not get an automatic free pass for a Wikipedia article. Sorry, but one's own made-up, personal standards for notability such as the above do not align with Wikipedia notability guidelines. Per Wikipedia's notability standards, what is required is significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources. Said necessary coverage does not appear to exist for this subject. North America1000 05:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:ANYBIO. There are no reliable references to back up this article and there is no significant coverage. AmericanAir88 (talk) 13:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree, fails WP:ANYBIO as above.  HighKing++ 15:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.