Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SimCity 5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  00:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

SimCity 5
All of this is speculation. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete unless something verifiable can be found, like a press release from Maxis. Antandrus  (talk) 04:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Antandrus. I'm also on Simtropolis, so I'm at a good position here. -TrackerTV 04:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless Maxis has confirmed this, it's failing WP:V. That's not to say that it won't be a good game...it's just that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. alpha Chimp  laudare 04:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang ( raves/review me! ) 05:31, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, fan speculation is not notable enough for an article. RandyWang ( raves/review me! ) 05:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Acyso 06:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - click here for more information. -- Big  top  07:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Michael 08:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Jared Hunt July 30, 2006, 10:25 (UTC)
 * Delete speculative Ace of Sevens 12:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Alphachimp. Jacqui ★ 14:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Should be expaned though. Ric36 20:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Please explain your keep. This is a discussion, and unsupported "votes' may be discounted.  User:Zoe|(talk) 21:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 20:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball --Stellmach 17:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Keep as The article for the Sims 2 Pets started out EXACTLY like this, was never considered for deletion, and thus is unfair to the creator of the article. --Moped 04:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Then I'm sure you will be more than willing to supply documentation of the existence of this game? User:Zoe|(talk) 04:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you've forgotten about the announcment made by EA in Germany confirming that a SimCity 5 is under production. --Moped 19:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * source? Ace of Sevens 20:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope, haven't forgotten that the article claims that, but no source has been provided. The article also claims that Maxis denies the existence of such a game (but that also is unsourced).  User:Zoe|(talk) 20:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * http://the-sims-downloads.com/article38.html%22 --Moped 20:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Keep Why take the page down? It's a bit of text.  Who's to say there won't be a SimCity5 (if you think about it...SimCity, SimCity 2000, SimCity 3000, and SimCity 4.  Is it just me or is there a pattern going on here...)  Plus, what do we accomplish if we delete it?  Save a few kb on the wiki servers?  What if something does come out?  Boom, it's up there.
 * The above was posted by User:205.238.250.102. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Keep ^ Ditto
 * The above was posted by User:4.227.98.79. User:Zoe|(talk) 20:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Our job isn't to provide up-to-the-minute updates on game rumours. Once reliable sources report on its production, it can have an article (if it happens). See crystal ball. --Wafulz 15:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If source for EA statement is found, then change my vote to Keep.
 * Delete So far there is no verifiable evidence that the game has been announced. Also if it is announced in the future the article can easily be recreated then. --Edgelord 22:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.