Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SimCorp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

SimCorp

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I cannot find any evidence that this company passes WP:NCORP. Even though it is publicly traded, the only sources I can find are press releases or Reuters briefs, which all fail WP:CORPDEPTH. shoy (reactions) 17:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 09:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Literally unreferenced. I note also the many redlinked SPAs in the history with a considerable interest in this article - David Gerard (talk) 10:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - This company has been very good at keeping itself out of the independent press. Maybe if one of the other wikis (da:SimCorp, no:SimCorp, fr:SimCorp) finds some good non-english refs the page could be recreated.  Until then, not notable.  --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 13:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is all still entirely PR where I consider it speedy material, none of this actually amounts to show how and why the company is independently notable. SwisterTwister   talk  19:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:G11. Corporate spam with no encyclopedic value. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.