Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simeon Osborn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Simeon Osborn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I frankly would've PRODed too as nothing here is actually substantial and significant with my searches mirroring this also, the best news there is, only about being the attorney for his clients. SwisterTwister  talk  23:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - This article was basically unsourced when I prodded it. Now it's full of sources covering WP:ROUTINE-level events. Still fails WP:NBIO. shoy (reactions) 17:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I thought this would meet GNG, but 1) the only two articles that are substantially about him are press releases 2) I can't confirm the award for Trial Lawyer of the year - there doesn't appear to be (anymore?) a Puget Sound chapter of the organization in question. (see map here). He was president-elect of a Washington Chapter which seems to be defunct, but the only announcement of the award is a press release that appears to have come from his law firm. LaMona (talk) 23:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.