Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simma Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 20:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Simma Software

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unfortunately, I did not find enough reliable sources for this article. Article is also borderline advertising, so if it can be tagged as G11, feel free to do so. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Laura Baban (the author): I`ve read here about G11: Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. And I think I created this page from a neutral point of view, same as other pages that have the same subject: Vector Informatik, Wind River Systems, Green Hills Software. What can I do more?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura Baban (talk • contribs) 15:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: looks like a last section of press release, no significant coverage in reliable sources, no long term effect on the history of the industry. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 08:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - advert for unnotable company. . . Mean as custard (talk) 10:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Update - I've wrote more about history of the company and about the impact in his field. And also I've deleted the list of products. Please review it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura Baban (talk • contribs) 21:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The impact of the company on the industry should not only be claimed, but also supported with inline citations to reliable sources as required per WP:V. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.