Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simmons Foods


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  12:48, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Simmons Foods

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a company/organization therefore NCORP guidelines apply. I am unable to locate references that meet both ORGIND and CORPDEPTH. Most of the references regurgitate corporate announcements and PR. The rest focus on the class action lawsuit but don't meet CORPDEPTH.  HighKing++ 13:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies.  HighKing++ 13:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Arkansas. Shellwood (talk) 13:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The following sources show the company meets WP:NCORP (not exhaustive):
 * The bottom two sources describe the companies employment practices, which is in scope of WP:CORPDEPTH.Jumpytoo Talk 23:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * The bottom two sources describe the companies employment practices, which is in scope of WP:CORPDEPTH.Jumpytoo Talk 23:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * The bottom two sources describe the companies employment practices, which is in scope of WP:CORPDEPTH.Jumpytoo Talk 23:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep large corporation in the pet food processing space with sources to back up information. Jonpatterns (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. While the primary sources need to be cut in part or in whole, the corporation is worthy of note. SWinxy (talk) 04:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.