Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Brobäck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, discounting the "as per @Necrothesp" comment! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Simon Brobäck

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Swedish teenager who attracted a couple human-interest stories by pitching an idea to build a skyscraper. Sources do not indicate anybody is actually building anything. If something gets built and the subject receives significant coverage this can probably be recreated. Blackguard 21:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: as per @Necrothesp; subject fails notability and GNG. Quis separabit?  02:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't comment! -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  → Call me  Razr   Nation  10:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - the coverage is in a couple of small local papers and does not begin to meet WP:SIGCOV. I cannot find any mention of Brobäck elsewhere, so WP:GNG is unfortunately not met. Clearly a smart guy, I read the articles in the local papers with interest, and I'm sure he has a bright future, but it is too soon for an article. --bonadea contributions talk 15:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable yet. I also find creating articles on precocious children a bit embarrassing, since if they fail (by whatever criteria their haters prefer) to live up to expectations of their life having a Wikipedia article at 18 I find it all too easy to imagine it being used as a way to mock them. Blythwood (talk) 07:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.