Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Edward Stokes (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Simon Edward Stokes
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actor per WP:BIO. SL93 (talk) 00:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 00:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 00:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 00:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. This apparently was kept in a 2005 AfD because the nomination was withdrawn. However, the only source I'm even finding on a web search today is IMDb, and that's not an indicator of notability as its content is user-contributed. Highway 89 (talk) 17:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Plus IMDb seeks to cover everything, which is not Wikipedia's goal. 2005 was the dark days of the wild west of Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:49, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete That is not fair to Kept this only to go unnoticed until now, but I agree with the nominatior. Sheldybett (talk) 16:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete we have so many articles only sourced to the non-reliable IMDb that we should make that a special speedy deletion category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:48, 9 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.