Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Gysbers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Simon Gysbers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY as has yet to play 100 minor pro, or 1 nhl game. OPJHL awards and college career confer no notability. PROD removed with comment that is was not appropriate? Ravendrop 19:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I believe this article shouldn't be deleted because this guy is getting more and more popular as we speak. He is playing more and more games at the AHL level. So far, in the 2010–11 AHL season which isn't over yet, he played 42 games according to the internet hockey database as of March 1,2011. And this season ends on April 25, 2011. Y.golovko (talk) 19:32, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: This isn't a fellow who's a handful of games away from meeting NHOCKEY. He's half a season away from doing so.  There aren't enough games left in the season to do so this year, and it's plain that through injuries or scratches he doesn't play in every game as it is.  A lot can happen to an undrafted farmhand between seasons ... such as deciding to move on and do something besides pro sports.  Check back this time next year.   Ravenswing  15:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:NHOCKEY, and as User:Ravenswing points out, he won't be able to make the threshold this season. A lot can happen between now and next season.  -Pparazorback (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.