Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Minter (YouTuber)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This has already been discussed at least twice, at Articles for deletion/Miniminter & Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Miniminter, with consensus to delete each time. The page has been created numerous times, under several titles. JBW (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Simon Minter (YouTuber)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is the latest attempt of many to create a Wikipedia page for this person. Previous drafts have been rejected and deleted multiple times for lack of WP:RS, and were ultimately salted against re-creation (see Draft:Miniminter for some of the history). This attempt comes from a very similar personal draft that has simply been moved over to mainspace. The subject still fails WP:GNG. MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note added later: there are earlier discussions at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Miniminter and Articles for deletion/Miniminter. There are other discussions, too, but I'm not going to waste time searching for them all yet again. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: I went to the article, and had to remove a clear BLP violation while there. The rest of it is mostly unsourced, and given the problematic history of the article, whoever is behind recreating this article repeatedly, should probably be warned (on whatever account they are using ATM) that they are heading into WP:SALT territory. The lack of notability has been noted previously, and it doesn't seem like anything has changed. Mako001 (C) (T)  14:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.