Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Plumbe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 00:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Simon Plumbe

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Recently deleted by PROD and then undeleted after request by the subject himself. I'm not seeing enough significant coverage to meet the WP:GNG The-Pope (talk) 10:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Neutral position: More notability would certainly be useful to defend this article, I am not able to vote delete due to lack of awareness of this persons contribution perhaps an Expert in the following star trek (sic) and/or the authors writing and/or the games critics side of things might advise, if this is worth saving? I have added expert and category Star Trek  User:MikeBeckett Please do say 'Hi!' 10:21, 16 May 2011 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeBeckett (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  — The-Pope (talk) 11:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  — The-Pope (talk) 11:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  — The-Pope (talk) 11:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - marginal figure in all these categories; note that he was not a member of Star Trek fandom, but rather a paid editorial person hired to run an Official Fan Club by the owners of that particular commercial franchise. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing in gnews, fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 02:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.