Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Rich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. &mdash;Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-24 12:14Z 

Simon Rich

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN person, article created by editor with history of being less than truthful, prod removed without comment by random IP&mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 16:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * (Changed to Keep based on new edits and information. &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 12:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC) )


 * Delete: I don't think a single New Yorker piece passes WP:BIO.  No other sources, practically no other information. Change to Keep per Kubigula.   RGTraynor  16:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Smerge to Frank Rich; at this point in his career, a sentence or two in his father's article should cover him. --Dhartung | Talk 19:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I found this profile from the Boston Globe and this review from the NYT.  The second one may be a slight COI (for the Times, not us), but he appears to meet WP:BIO despite his youth.-- Kubigula (talk) 22:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Keep Kubigula's sources point to enough notability to pass WP:BIO. Darkspots 08:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Now falls under WP:NOTE -- St.daniel talk 11:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.