Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simone Holcomb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 03:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Simone Holcomb
Delete - the subject was briefly in the news almost 3 years ago. There have been many, many cases of soldiers returning to the US then refusing to go back. This individual decided to tell the media. It's self generated "notability." Nothing more was written about this after she was reassigned to Fort Carson, and probably nothing else ever will be. Nobunaga24 01:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC) ~Delete per nom. Weatherman90 01:56, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 01:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Del. Czar Dragon 01:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. "Self-generated notability" is notability, and is the norm rather than the exception. She fought the law, and the law lost, and isn't that notable enough, too? Monicasdude 02:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Not that notable, but notable enough. --DMG413 03:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &rArr;    SWAT Jester   [[Image:Flag_of_Iceland.svg|18px|]]  Ready    Aim    Fire!  03:24, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Will anyone care about this person in 100 years?  100 minutes?  Does anyone care now?  I doubt it.   dbtfz talk 05:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Dbtfz... couldn't have put it better myself. -- Kinu t /c  06:20, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep marginally notable in the greater scheme of things. ProhibitOnions 11:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep although article could be cleaned/expaned. It may be a precedent of some small significance. Bondegezou 14:33, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  16:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as someone featured by major news sources. Turnstep 19:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. If we're going to delete people who are self-notable, let's start with Angelyne.  User:Zoe|(talk) 21:56, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep more news articles about him than there are about me. Sparsefarce 00:17, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, borders on notable. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 00:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, might have some historical interest, but no context is provided in the article. Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.