Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SimpList


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

SimpList

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A non-notable PHP script. Weregerbil 05:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Everything is all wrong. No sources, no assertion of notability, and no scholarly neutral tone either. Yechiel Man 05:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Gotta be WP:COI. Written in "proud papa" speak.  No assertion of notability. - Richfife 06:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, no assertion of notability, and probably a conflict of interest. Hut 8.5 09:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No Delete Sources have been stated, "Merely participating in or having professional expertise in a subject is not, by itself, a conflict of interest." according to this it is not a conflict of interest. In no way does it boast about the script, is in netural tone. what is "assertion of notability" supposed to mean, cannot find in wikipedia help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.212.213 (talk • contribs)
 * Reply still delete Notability guidelines are here: WP:NOTABLE. Putting a program on a website that accepts all submissions (IMDB, SourceForge, (Cough)Wikipedia(Cough)) does not count towards notability. - Richfife 03:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply So are you saying that everything on SourceForge, IMDB or Wikipedia is a fake? Also a source was the project developer. Two sources, both which are credible. There is a lot of effort put into sourceforge, the monitoring of, the creation of projects and the prevention of theft. mrtechguy
 * Reply I'm not saying everything on those sites is fake. Read it again.  I'm saying that getting something onto those sites doesn't prove it's fake or real at all.  They don't have reliable review processes and don't pretend to. - Richfife 21:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.