Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simple view of ethics and morals

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). – ABCD 22:37, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Simple view of ethics and morals
I propose that we delete or redirect this article. This article was a personal essay by the now-banned Entmoots of Trolls, and it never developed into an actual article. He made this as a parallel to our real article on Ethics because he didn't like the contents of Ethics. However, Wikipedia policy says that we should not have parallel articles on the same subject. Thus, this page also falls into the category of Duplicate articles. Whenever we have two articles on the same topic, we delete one, and redirect to the other. Any important information from the deleted article can be moved to the new article. RK 16:35, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. POV, personal essay. RK 20:07, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV, personal essay. Jayjg (talk)  18:36, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What they said.   brian0918  &#153;  20:18, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV, personal essay. Oleg Alexandrov 20:43, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Personal essay. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:01, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - personal POV essay. --JimWae 21:10, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; PoV, personal essay (and pretty poor at that). Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 21:16, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete If the author is a banned user, then we should not even need to debate it. AFAIK wikipedia policy is to automatically delete anything written by a banned user on sight. Are we sure that the author is that pain-in-the-ass Entmoot of Trolls? If it is, then this should be binned immediately and all his edits, no matter where on no matter what, should be reverted/deleted instantly. Fear ÉIREANN  22:17, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV fork, essay. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:14, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV fork, original research. Pace User:Jtdirl, I don't think that articles contributed by banned users should be deleted without consideration: there may be useful content hidden in them (here, I'm a little sympathetic to the right-vs-right way of looking at ethical problems). --- Charles Stewart 09:07, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, personal essay. Note that the banned-user issue doesn't trigger automatic deletion in this case, because it was written before he was banned. --Michael Snow 00:52, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. How was this article allowed to exist for so long? -- Hadal 05:32, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.