Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simply K-Pop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  13:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Simply K-Pop

 * – ( View AfD View log )

How would it notable, worthy of notice if there's no reliable, independent source at all? I think it should be merged with Music programs of South Korea. 1Way4Together - J. Smile &#124; Awards and similar items are not for sales 08:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Search Google or some engine web test, there's no source mentioned Simply K-pop now a days (artist perform in Simply K-pop usually don't get mentioned in article). Long-running doesn't guarantee notability. 1Way4Together - J. Smile &#124; Awards and similar items are not for sales 10:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Also nominated Pops in Seoul for the same reason. 1Way4Together - J. Smile &#124; Awards and similar items are not for sales 08:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, long-running tv shows, and the nominator doesn't provide a convincing argument. Geschichte (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Additional reason have been provided, 1Way4Together - J. Smile &#124; Awards and similar items are not for sales 10:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * But how can you be sure, have you searched comprehensively for sources in the Korean language? I know I can't. (By the way, your signature is long and confusing.) Geschichte (talk) 19:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  08:07, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - there's plenty of coverage and its not hard to find. Hell, the COVID-19 tests taken by the hosts received coverage. The channel itself has received coverage in industry publications and articles like this. There's more than enough for me. And the lack of effort in nominating this article suggests the other co-nomination (which probably shouldn't have been included here anyway) should be kept by default.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 05:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep A quick search on Google for 심플리 케이팝 shows many coverages. Htanaungg (talk) 04:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep There's tons of coverage on Naver for Simply Kpop going as far back as 2012 (and that's just using only the show title as a search term), and for Pops In Soeul from as far back as 2006, which is the primary place that references for most SK music program articles are/can be sourced from. Did you even bother to do more than a cursory Google search before nominating either page? Eng-lang sources will never be in the majority when it comes to these particular types of articles. I'd suggest familiarizing yourself with the WP:KO/RS list as another editor recommended to you on this related talk page, because it appears you want to help make improvements on pages but don't really seem to know or understand how to properly write+reliably source changes. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 12:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.