Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simpsons, season 19


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep &mdash; Caknuck 18:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

The Simpsons, season 19
Unsourced crystal ballyness synthesis on every page, are very unlikely to be unstubbed before October. Several titles aren't even sourced, for god's sake. Will (talk) 11:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all, but KEEP Treehouse of Horror XVIII, as this occurs every year and is almost a definate. Dalejenkins 11:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: They could easily be unstubbed before October as the season begins in September and information is released as early as late July. Which ones aren't sourced? They were sourced when I created them. As well, the title of every episode with a page is in the copyright database. -- Scorpion0422 12:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment and WP:CRYSTAL says "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable" and all of this information IS verifiable. -- Scorpion0422 12:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect -- All the information is verifiable, but there's not enough to justify a separate article at present. Matthew 12:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep/Redirect to The Simpsons (season 19): All of the articles are sourced, and will continue to have new info added when it released over the summer. I see no ned to full delete them as they arn't speculating at all. Also N is for Nerder is a redirect anyway... Gran2 13:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, these shows will happen. It's not like The Simpsons isn't well known and notable.  Deletion will just prompt someone else to re-create the articles about 2 seconds later. Lugnuts 15:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Lugnuts. Jauerback 15:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above--JForget 17:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep What's the use of deleting these when they are sourced, verifiable, and would just be recreated in a couple of months? There is also the probability that additional information will become available on all of these prior to their release, normally beginning at the end of July/beginning of August. As it stands, they're legitimate "stubs". SkierRMH 21:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. If we delete them, we'll just end up recreating them later. --Jnelson09 22:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, if this were season 20 I'd undertsnad the logic but in three months time they're only going to need to be recreated. Darrenhusted 14:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.