Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sims 99


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Sims 99
Suspected vanity. No reliable, independant sources. Pointless list of modertators Drat (Talk) 08:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of machinima deletions. Drat (Talk) 08:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Daveydw ee b ( chat/patch ) 08:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB. Traffic rank of nearly 400,000 on Alexa, which isn't high enough to convince me that this is worth keeping. Daveydw ee b ( chat/patch ) 09:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as prodder and nom. MER-C 09:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:WEB. Wickethewok 20:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - 1025 BBS members not noteable nough. User:Yy-bo 20:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:WEB and fails WP:V in that popularity figures are sourced from the website in question and seem to be inflated in importance. For instance, "Over 35,700 reviews" includes many 1-sentence comments that do not qualify as "reviews" by any reasonable measure.
 * Delete for lack of reliable, verifiable third-party sources. — TKD::Talk 06:55, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Was expecting an article about some antiquated version of The Sims.  RFerreira 05:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Although this process is going to end soon anyway, I suggest that it may actually warrant Speedy deletion and should be protected from recreation, as it has been repeatedly deleted under another name.--Drat (Talk) 07:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nn website. +Fin- 16:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.