Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SimulTrans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

SimulTrans

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced article on a company which restates marketing claims (ISO 9001, for example, is about as generic as you get) but fails to establish why being "the largest and oldest full service localization and translation firm on the West Coast" is actually significant (it could, for all we know, be the only one). Created by a WP:SPA, this one lights up the WP:COI sensors especially given the history, which is spammy to say the least. Guy (Help!) 18:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom as the editor that previously templated the article for the same reasons. Toddst1 (talk) 19:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Doesn't seem to pass WP:COMPANY. See . — Rankiri (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete While I restored the deleted article per a request at WP:REFUND, a subsequent google and gnews search isn't turning up independent, reliable sources showing notability. Lots and lots of press releases, but little that's independent and substantial. More than willing to reconsider if sources turn up, but as of now, I say delete.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  21:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.