Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simunition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Simunition

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG. I find lots of passing mentions but nothing which gives significant coverage of the company. Maybe there is some coverage in specialty publications and if someone can find the sources I will withdraw my nomination. Jbh Talk  01:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- I'm seeing uses of "simunition" as a generic noun, but nothing on the company. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - the coverage that exists in reliable sources is (as K.e.coffman mentioned) either referring to a generic product or a very trivial mention (name mention with no further elaboration) in reference to local police departments. No significant coverage. Appable (talk | contributions) 21:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.