Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sin rastro de ti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:53, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Sin rastro de ti

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. Fails WP:MOVIE & WP:TVSHOW. No sources. At best this is a case of WP:NOTYET Zackmann08  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per major improvements by user using the many available Spanish language sources somehow missed by the nominator in his WP:BEFORE. Well done .  Sorry  the points here being that 1) notability is determined through sources being available not through their being used, 2) per WP:NONENG sourcing does not have to be in English, 3) when sources are available we do not send an improvable topic to deletion, and 4) that WP:BEFORE is a very useful tool.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 12:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per article improvements. More sources are likely to be available in the future as this is a new series. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.