Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinar Bintang School Cadet Corps (SBKRS)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Kadet Remaja Sekolah Malaysia. As an individual unit of a national youth organization, this is not sufficiently notable. Redirecting it to the article on the national organization keeps the material in the history and allows someone to merge relevant material to the article on the national organization. The Scout people are doing this all the time. Bduke (talk) 11:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Sinar Bintang School Cadet Corps (SBKRS)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article on a school organization in Malaysia with extensive history but no references and no evidence of outside notability. -- Finngall  talk  15:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Article on a local branch or a national youth organisation. We have had similar discussions in the past on Scout troops, Air Cadet units, etc, etc, etc, and consensus seems to be that unless there is something particularly and especially special about a single unit, it is not notable. Emeraude (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * This is an article about an youth organisation that is similar to Malaysia Scout Organisation which also have an article about them in Wikipedia. If Malaysia Scout Movement can post an article here, i don't see any problem doing the same thing. This youth organisation is same important as Malaysia Scout Movement and its directly under the Government of Malaysia. This article enable students to know more about the organisation in this popular wikipedia. This is something educational and far more meaningful than articles about Movies and celebrities over here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keropi88 (talk • contribs) 09:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment No, this is not an article about a youth organisation. It is about a single branch of the youth orgnisation, Kadet Remaja Sekolah Malaysia, which may deserve an article but individual local chapters do not.Emeraude (talk) 10:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC).


 * Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. And delete the images on the page as well, which are probably copyvios. Stifle (talk) 18:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —Camaron | Chris (talk) 19:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Move page to Kadet Remaja Sekolah and stub. Whilst I accept that the local chapter is not notable, the national organisation certainly is. There are enough bits and pieces in the existing article to make a viable stub. I was tempted to go ahead and create the new article but that would be a cut'n'paste that would have GFDL problems so a page move, to preserve the history, is better. There are some Google sources on the national body but full sourcing is likely to have to be found locally; we need to be aware of the need to avoid systemic bias. TerriersFan (talk) 19:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - there is a book here from which the national organisation can be verified. TerriersFan (talk) 20:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - there is a book here from which the national organisation can be verified. TerriersFan (talk) 20:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Move per TerriersFan. CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:21, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Article author has now created Kadet Remaja Sekolah Malaysia, but it's sub-stub level at this point. -- Finngall  talk  19:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - this is just not the way to do it since it would be a cut'n'paste. My proposal was to move the page and then stub it by stripping out most of the content. There is not a huge amount of usable prose but there is some. I still think we should do that - move the page over the newly created page. TerriersFan (talk) 20:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.