Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinclair Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 15:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Sinclair Institute

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Since this is the contributor's only article, I would have to assume that he/she is associated with the company and is using this page as advertisement. The language is definitely favorable towards the company, and the external links don't seem to qualify as objective references. This article may even fall under, , but notability is debatable, so Afd instead.

...at least it follows layout convention. vlad§inger tlk  03:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as an advertisement with predominantly primary sourcing for references. No prejudice against recreation if the Institute can be shown to be notable within our guidelines and policies and is written from a neutral position. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. This is about a business that apparently sells sex toys and porn with an elaborate therapistic patter that probably results in a substantial markup over that dingy little shop in the bad part of town. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.