Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sindh National Front


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  Greenbörg  (talk)  06:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Sindh National Front

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Better to redirect to its creator who is notable.  Greenbörg  (talk)  09:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong keep Clearly notable enough in the provincial politics of Sindh . And led by a notable politician.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 10:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited. Namechecking doesn't make one org notable. We can redirect the page to its founder.  Greenbörg  (talk)  10:36, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Comment "No coverage in WP:RS". Really? It is covered in numerous books in English, generally in association with its leader Mumtaz Bhutto. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 12:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * There is no independent coverage for this political party. You are saying because it is namechecked so it should be notable. Please, read WP:ORG.  Greenbörg  (talk)  14:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * obvious keep C'mon, I get a Gscholar hit like this: " Ayub's faltQjhulam Mustafa Syed formed the Sindh National Front which demanded diat Sindhi be die official language of an autonomous Sindhu Desh within a loosely federated Pakistan." [sic] There are sources. Mangoe (talk) 16:38, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * keep Relatively important and named on national media outlets. Socerb102 (talk) 16:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.