Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sindhi Hindus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Weight of consensus appears to support deletion. I note that Culturalrevival, one of the keep supporters, made his comment contingent upon sourcing, which has not been added.-- Kubigula (talk) 16:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Sindhi Hindus

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Was listed as a speedy. The speedy criteria do not apply since this is not an individual or organization. The article is certainly not an example of our best work, and I don't know enough about the subject to determine whether it should be kept. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:17, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Oppose: This article has some potentially valuable information. I think that the community could work together to merge this article, or perhaps get some references. Babylonian Armor (talk) 19:38, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Sindhi people contains the interesting naming and historical information from this article, and treats the entire topic much better. Merge not needed. Jisakujien (talk) 19:58, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - should be tagged with multiple issues for cleanup, wikify, and unreferenced, but an attempt should be made to salvage. Dew Kane (talk) 03:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep needs multiple reliable sources. I will change my vote if none are provided. Culturalrevival (talk) 01:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete or Article Incubator (I tagged it with CSD) - Without reliable sources it fails the Verifiability policy and as per the nom "certainly not an example of our best work", I do think the Sindhi people is a much better article. I hoped that during the AfD the artical would be improved and am also minded to agree with Dew Kane in that an attempt should be made to salvage, hence my suggestion to move it to the Article Incubator. Codf1977 (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.