Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinensis Tea Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Jclemens (talk) 03:16, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Sinensis Tea Company

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable company. A Google News Archive search returns no reliable sources. The author likely has a WP:COI with the company per their comments at User talk:Cunard (permalink). Cunard (talk) 22:29, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. You would think that something should show up online. Bearian (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:54, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nomination this is textbook NN in terms of how notability is judged on Wikipedia. JBsupreme (talk) 22:56, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Joe Chill (talk) 23:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.