Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singam 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Singam. This is done without prejudice to the article being re-developed later, if notability is asserted sufficiently after the film is released. Anything worth merging can be done from the history, obviously ensuring content is attributed. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  00:28, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Singam 2

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Future film should be deleted as per WP:NFF.  Secret of success  Talk to me  14:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Singam until Singam 2 begins filming. EelamStyleZ (talk) 15:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Redirecting to Singam might also be another good option. -- Commander (Ping Me) 16:15, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect. -- Karthik Nadar (talk) 16:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete or Redirect to Singam as stated above by other editors. Johannes003 (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect - per above → Σ  τ  c . 22:39, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Question : Has the film even been confirmed to go on floors for a redirect?  Secret of success  Talk to me  05:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * There's extensive talk about it, which makes it slightly notable, but nothing's confirmed, so a redirect is pretty appropriate. EelamStyleZ (talk) 06:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect : Create a new section titled Sequel in the article Singam and move it there with redirect to that link Singam. -- WorLD8115   ( TalK )   12:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Unless official word from producer or else is given, it is useless to even create such a section.  Secret of success  Talk to me  13:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per User:world8115, as such is not useless to our readers at all. Specially as policy specifically states that "it is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced," AND as long as editors do not insert their own opinions or analyses in such discussion. As clarified at WP:Planned films... if a film is not yet ready for its own article, it is appropriate to find a home for properly sourced information at a suitable redirect target.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I think we've pretty much acheived a consensus here so why isn't anything being done to this article? Redirect or no, this page shouldn't be an article yet. It's going out of hand with this edit here. These users need to be warned to stop uploading fan-made images and stop creating articles prematurely. EelamStyleZ (talk) 20:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Inappropiate edits will be dealt with as they usually are... and I will hope new editors are aware of WP:PRIMER. As we are now at 7 days, a close is imminent and in a few hours the matter will be rendered moot.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.