Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore Business Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  12:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Singapore Business Review

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Limited sources covering the topic extensively that may suggest its notability. It may be worth reevaluating its notability merits to stay. Donaldherald (talk) 12:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Donaldherald (talk) 12:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Of the three sources in the article, one is the company's Twitter page, another a page that makes no mention to the subject, and another one that may be reliable, but mostly just links a bunch of articles from the company. Other than hat, I didn't really see anything else of note. Lynch44 (talk) 15:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  16:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.