Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore Sea Brothers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 20:58, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Singapore Sea Brothers
Non-notable vanity page. Fightindaman 16:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:VANITY. Hello32020 17:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:BIO and WP:WEB. Pure vanity. Prolog 21:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Not to be deleted. This article must not be deleted. Its someones fact and personal possessions. They don't harm anyone at all. Try to understand the situation. I'm a newcomer. "Don't bite me." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rizan (talk • contribs).
 * Comment. Articles on Wikipedia must pass the notability criteria. Also, when you contribute text to Wikipedia it is no longer your "personal possession", and can be edited or possible deleted. If you want to save your writing, I suggest you copy the full text to your hdd and maybe add it to your blog/website instead. Prolog 04:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as above, with prejudice. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:BIO and WP:WEB. Yomangani talk 15:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: What's the difference between this article and Singapore sea brothers, which was just speedily deleted as a G7 (see the AfD immediately below this one)? --Aaron 16:25, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The original author (and sole contributor) requested that Singapore sea brothers be deleted, but hasn't with this one. Yomangani talk 17:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If author himself requested deletion of its twin. Pedia-I  Project J e s u s June 29, 2024
 * Delete per Pedia-I. Plus that whole WP:VAIN and nn thing. --Aaron 19:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * User Comment: "Wikipedia" It's free, the one to be deleted is the first one due to its sub-heading and incomplete patch-ups; not the second, because it is all facts and records in Singapore Bedok Jetty. Thanks for deleting the first one; regretted, should try on the sandbox's first. Singapore Sea Brothers should'nt be a problem cause the website have gain fishing fan in the world with its place in the highest Top 30. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rizan (talk • contribs).
 * Comment: Top 30 of what? That is an assertion of notability, but for it to be valid you must show third-party documentation -- someone else's website showing that your website is popular. Abstain until notability is established or disproven. Alba 03:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * User Comment: You may visit all this Top 100 fishing site @:


 * http://www.fishing-fan.co.uk/worldtopsites/in.php?id=313


 * http://www.bigfishtackle.com/top50/1594


 * http://www.sea-fishing.org/topsite/


 * http://www.topfishingsites.com/in.php?id=253


 * http://www.hitsunlimited.com/fish/100topsalt/100top.html

You may click at them, and search for Singapore Sea Brothers + it is notable due the early record of the early 80's 150 kilogrammes of Stingray. PS: for more on the rating do visit my site @ the Singapore Sea Brothers


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.