Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singersroom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Aoidh (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Singersroom

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I can't find any evidence of notability. (Doesn't directly impact on notability but the content is largely spam and possibly autogenerated. https://singersroom.com/write-for-us-guest-posts-on-singers-room/ indicates that people pay to post articles to it for digital marketing purposes). JaggedHamster (talk) 14:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Websites. JaggedHamster (talk) 14:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The issue here has to be whether there is substantial, reliable, secondary coverage of the website/magazine itself to establish notability. The current references aren't at all helpful in that regard. The Stacks reference is simply a press release from Singersroom itself announcing an online poll. Interestingly, buried in that press release is the statement that Singersroom is rated “one of the Internet’s top music sources” by XXL magazine. That might be notable - XXL (magazine) appears to be a reliable source, but I cannot find any link or article that would confirm that as a fact. Being voted "Best Soul Site" by Soul Train viewers in an online poll a single time would not appear to be notable. The best source I have found is a profile of the founders from 2011 in Black Enterprise but I can't find anything else at all that would qualify as substantial, independent coverage. I see lots of citations to its articles/listicles/surveys, sometimes even in reliable secondary sources e.g. , but nothing else of substance about the site itself. Banks Irk (talk) 18:54, 21 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.