Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Single + Remix Collections


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect. The only thing to merge is the track listing, and I do not see anybody explicitly objecting moving this info to the parent article. Redirect is always preferable to deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Single + Remix Collections

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NALBUMS. No coverage, no reviews. The sources in the article aren't RS. MSJapan (talk) 03:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge Whilst I agree that the album is not inherently notable, the band that released it is, so it would probably be better if it were merged into the bands page and then ""deleted"" --Joseon Empire (talk) 19:43, 03 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Selective Merge to Anamanaguchi § Compilation albums, to improve the latter article. North America1000 15:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's nothing actual to merge, they are all the same contents, nothing else different and thus if tagged for merge, this will either stay like that or simply be redirected which anyone could've made. Thus there's nothing actually considerable to merge. SwisterTwister   talk  18:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment – The merge target I suggested above (Anamanaguchi § Compilation albums) presently only has the name of the album on the page and the date of release, and nothing else (verbatim: "Single + Remix Collections (2012)"). It's unclear how one could assess this as that "they are all the same contents", because plainly put, the content is not identical whatsoever, not by a long shot. Was the merge target suggested even viewed? North America1000 19:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment – Perhaps this is an error duplicate copy/paste !vote from another discussion, or of your !vote at Articles for deletion/Power Supply (EP), which is verbatim to this one. However, the assessment there is also incorrect relative to the content of the two pages. The !votes in this and the other discussion are only one minute apart. Requesting clarification; perhaps an error occurred? North America1000 22:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It not an "error" or "copy and paste", no. SwisterTwister   talk  22:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and move content under its entry in the band's article. (Why did not some justly boldly do it ?)   Aoziwe (talk) 11:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I see now too ditto North America above. Aoziwe (talk) 11:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.