Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Single Supplement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was &#123;{wi}&#125;. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-08 13:49Z 

Single Supplement

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

We are not a dictionary. —— Eagle 101  Need help? 07:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. -- K.Z       Talk  •   Vandal   •  Contrib  07:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Haemo 10:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete term isn't even that notable even for a dicdef Whilding87  10:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.