Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Single point of resolution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 21:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Single point of resolution

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

As currently written, article is little more than a dictionary entry. There is no indication that the term is notable enough to have it's own article. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * More details: User:TFOWR ran a [Google Search], which does produce results. However, my scanning of these results is that they are not using the term in the way the article is.  That is, they seem to use the term more in the general sense that two or more things may converge to a single point, not in the sense of an organization relying on a single resources.Qwyrxian (talk) 13:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. A phrase that could mean many things in a variety of contexts. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Transwiki per nom. T3h   1337   b0y  18:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, says ceiling cat. Nom nom nom.Mtiffany71 (talk) 18:58, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's potentially a perfectly valid piece. Just needs to be expanded. james gibbon  20:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * And how is such expansion possible? What is said about this subject in sources that could be added to an article? Uncle G (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Question. Is this a term coined in 2010 by the people from the article's reference, or is it an older term? I can't find any information on it, nor on the reference used.--Atlan (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete my recent edits to Single point of failure make this article an orphan. --Kvng (talk) 20:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and screw all deletionists!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Terveetkadet (talk • contribs) 00:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * How very helpful.--Atlan (talk) 15:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's something inherently wrong with the definition: a single resource to resolve any issue? In the absence of RS I suspect that this is a very ill-formulated concept that has no chances to take off, not in RL not even in the ivory tower. East of Borschov 10:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find any reliable sources. The one reference used in the article can't be found online either (at least I couldn't find it). With seemingly no one able to give a satisfactory answer to my question above, I'll assume the term is not notable and perhaps a neologism.--Atlan (talk) 14:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.