Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinitus Tempo (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Sinitus Tempo
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This musician does not appear to meet the notability guidelines (see: CREATIVE).

The article relies on two types of self-published work:


 * 1) the self-published albums and social media pages of the musician (see: MUSICBIO)
 * 2) mentions of the musician by self-published music blogs (see: BLOGS)

The content of the article appears to be comprised almost entirely of original research (see: No_original_research).

I have researched this musician and cannot find any sources that mention this musician, other than self-published music blogs or the musicians own social media profiles (see: VERIFY).

I have reviewed the article history and can find no revisions that meet the wikipedia guidelines for inclusion or suggest that this musician is notable (see: GNG).

As a result of the above I suggest this article be deleted.

--64Winters (talk) 15:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm incredibly concerned that this user's very first actions have been solely to do with this AfD... Then again, the article itself was created by an SPA. I've found these links, I'll leave others to debunk them:, , , . Some of these are quite short, but there we go - there are also a heck of a lot of different Blogspot sites that review/comment/announce his work, although these are obviously not reliable. Lukeno94 (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - I understand your concern. However, a user does have to start somewhere. For me, this is the first time I have seen something that I felt I could help correct. The article in question has existed for over six months, doesn't appear to conform to the guidelines, and yet is not being amended or removed. I would love for others to contribute and look at the links you provide. From my reading of the guidelines (for example: MUSICBIO, BLOGS) these sources do not qualify as reliable, nor does the musician qualify as notable. --64Winters (talk) 16:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I do appreciate your point about this being your first contribution, and hope I haven't offended you in any way - but after you've been editing for a while, you get used to that sort of thing happening! I'm not very good at assessing verifiability of sources (apart from obvious ones like the BBC), as I freely admit regularly. Lukeno94 (talk) 21:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Bandcamp artist lacking significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Full of peackoking and name dropping but article fails to demonstrate any real notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:MUSIC. Though a few rare exceptions exist, unsigned musicians are nearly never notable. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  05:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing found that would indicate that an article is appropriate. --Michig (talk) 10:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.