Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinpar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  13:51, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Sinpar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There are two sources, one a photo caption, and a lot of unsourced content. Slatersteven (talk) 13:45, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Slatersteven (talk) 13:45, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Transportation.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure if there are enough sources to justify keeping it, but I did find some additional ones. The Berliet Foundation has an article about them, and there are a few entries in automobile encyclopedias like the Complete Encyclopedia of Motorcars. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Part of the problem is there appear to be two companies (or more?), so are they the same one, or one set up by two people with the same names or some other reason? Slatersteven (talk) 09:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep There appears to be more information and there appear to be more sources in the German language and the French language entries of which this appears to be a summary.  If anyone can be bothered to improve it, starting from those sources and building according to what turns up along the way, there is plenty of scope for that.   If no one can be bothered to improve it at present, then methinks it remains informative enough to be classified as a stub+ until someone comes along with the appropriate combination of motivation and time.  Be well Charles01 (talk) 16:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sufficient sourcing available to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - plenty notable, I know I have linked to this in the past. Sources suffice and I will be happy to add more once I am done moving house.  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  02:09, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.