Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sintuition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete Nacon kantari  03:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Sintuition
Non-notable; 634 hits on Google, most of which seem to be from MySpace, forums, etc. RidG Talk 01:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Actually, 160 unique google hits; no listing at allmusic; having a myspace profile is telling, but the kicker is the statement in article that: "The band are currently unsigned, but have self released 2 CD's." NN. --Fuhghettaboutit 01:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Deleta as non-notable per WP:MUSIC. TedTalk/Contributions 02:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This band is notable, we do not need to delete, please allow for organic expansion. -- Librarianofages 02:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Organic expansion is what happens to compost heaps when you pour stuff on them. Delete--Agamemnon2 11:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I dont see any indication it meets WP:MUSIC. Fan1967 02:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment They did play "Download", have been featured in an internationally published magazine with wide coverage & have played numerous times all over England (note that national tours are a condition for notability as per wp:music).. I'd say they are on the cusp of becoming irrefutably notable. As I said, pls allow for organic expansion. -- Librarianofages 02:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment To be one of 100 acts at a large festival isn't really that distinctive. Have they actually had a national tour, or have they played a bunch of clubs in different places? What exactly did the magazine say about them ("have been featured in" is awfully vague)? They may be on the cusp of being notable (many bands are), but I don't see anything to say they're there. I'm not sure what you mean by "allow for organic expansion." Fan1967 03:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment A "review" does not mean you have been "featured in" a magazine. On the cusp of greatness applies to all bands that ever picked up a guitar. I have no prejudice against recreation of this article when they become irrefutably notable, but we don't do crystal-balling/allow for natural expansion. --DaveG12345 09:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - it admits to being unsigned and there is no indication of winning comps, selling CDs etc.Blnguyen | rant-line 02:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per TedE. It might fail Wikipedia:Notability (music) --Starionwolf 03:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The band essentially declares itself non-notable. --Coredesat talk 04:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom & Fuhghettaboutit. --DaveG12345 09:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's ugly, and it smells. Black-Velvet  09:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable yet. NawlinWiki 19:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - No label, not notable. --Joelmills 02:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.