Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siobhán Coady


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mindmatrix 15:55, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Siobhán Coady
Not notable. Merely being a candidate does not satisfy WP:BIO. Unless someone can add to the article to show that she is notable for reasons other than being a candidate, then I say delete. Skeezix1000 13:24, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, hopefully I have made this article notable with my recent editions. HJKeats 14:41, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I have changed my vote to keep, as she appears notable based on HJKeats's edits and additions. Skeezix1000 22:03, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep see Canadian federal election, 2006 (candidates) and Centralized discussion/Legislative candidates. - SimonP 14:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - national election candidate, major party, seems an obvious keep. Guettarda 16:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep slightly more notable than most candidates. Siobhán was considered a star candidate for the Liberals in 2004 (although he lost). Eusebeus 17:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. As this person has more claims to fame than just being a candidate, she is notable enough for mine. However, non-notable candidates should be included in a page like 2006 election for constituency X noting who was running and allowing a page to be created if a new member is elected. Capitalistroadster 18:03, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not only is this is the candidate for a leading party in the election, this is the favourite, surely?.  Nfitz 04:42, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep --- Candidates do not merit articles unless notable for other reasons. This one meets that test.  209.202.119.248 14:48, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.