Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sioma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Electriccatfish2 (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Sioma

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

African town stub of dubious notability, the only (unsourced) claim is that it's near to some waterfalls which are notable. Salimfadhley (talk) 21:18, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - It does appear to be an actual settlement.  Even the nom is not disputing it's a town. --Oakshade (talk) 21:39, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: A quick look through Google Books shows this town actually exists where it says it does. Added two additional sources to the article to give a better idea that this does exist. --LauraHale (talk) 11:55, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: This is a well-sourced article about an actual geographical location. Maile66 (talk) 13:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:NPLACE: Cities and villages are generally kept, regardless of size, as long as their existence is verified through a reliable source Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.