Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Andrew Roberts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted all as vandalism (or, if you prefer, A7 since claims are non-credible) —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-24 11:06Z 

Sir Andrew Roberts

 * and the related pages Lord Officer of the Royal Palaces, Royalty Protection Branch, Lord Security Officer for Her Majesty Queen, Lord Security Officer for The Royal Family, Lord Officer of the Royal Palaces, LORP, LSOHMQ and LSORF

This person does not exist! There is no such thing as the Lord Officer of the Royal Palaces, the Royalty Protection Branch, the Lord Security Officer for Her Majesty Queen, the Lord Security Officer for The Royal Family or the Lord Officer of the Royal Palaces and this and those articles belong in the bin. The 9th Earl of Jersey didn't have a daughter called Sharon, and Lady Sarah Roberts doesn't exist and certainly didn't have any liasion with the 11th Duke of Marlborough. Also, User:Tvaddict and User:Helloamerica are adding crap to British Royalty pages and seem to be the same person. Craigy (talk) 00:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant hoax. Google finds only 27 hits for Sir Andrew Roberts. Kimchi.sg 00:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; definitely a hoax. (Zero ghits for "Lady Sarah Roberts"!) Maintainer, make sure to get all six articles. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 01:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete All (six pages). Obvious hoax per above. Tevildo 01:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all, definite hoax, all pages created yesterday by same user, none of the "titles" generates and Ghits --Deville (Talk) 01:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:HOAX. --Coredesat 01:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm including the six "titles" in this AfD. Delete all. TheProject 02:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: no google hits, looks like a hoax. And you'd better add LSOHMQ, LSORF, and LORP, and check their other contributions.  bikeable (talk) 02:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete all as hoaxes. Mackensen (talk) 02:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete all. Unfortunately, hoaxes don't qualify for speedy, but they might for ban. ;) Danny Lilithborne 03:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Danny is correct. Hoaxes do not qualify for speedy-deletion but a block seems appropriate in this case if the user does not stop after being warned.  Delete all.  By the way, I'm adding a few more related pages found by reviewing the user's contribution history. Rossami (talk) 04:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * User:Helloamerica has, indeed, been indefinitely blocked as a "disruptive sock". Zetawoof(&zeta;) 04:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. The names and titles used trace back to a recurring hoax from a 13-year-old kid named Stefan Roberts who apparently likes to imagine himself as British nobility. (His name is in the third paragraph here.) See related AfDs:
 * Articles for deletion/Earl of Amersham
 * Articles for deletion/Stefan Roberts (second nomination)
 * Articles for deletion/Stefan Roberts
 * Recurring themes are the kid's name, as well as Villiers and the house of Jersey. Fan1967 04:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note. I suspect a checkuser will find that User:Tvaddict, as well as User:Helloamerica is the same as User:Johnpallen, who was responsible for the last round. Fan1967 04:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I suspect so as well. Mackensen (talk) 04:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Destroy all of Her Majesty's Most Inestimably Poor Hoaxes. Jammo (SM247) 04:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.